Method and apparatus for determining the health and remaining service life of austenitic steel reformer tubes and the like

ABSTRACT

Testing methods and apparatus for testing the health of steel tubes used in reformers and other tubes and pipes used in other high temperature applications. The method includes the steps of transmitting two sinusoidal electromagnetic signals, each having a different frequency F1 and F2, into the reformer tube, receiving a response signal, and analyzing the received response signal&#39;s intermodulation frequencies to determine the state of the steel reformer tube.

Notice: More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissueof U.S. Pat. No. 9,546,982. The reissue applications are applicationSer. Nos. 15/936,649, which is the present application, and 17/238,487,which is a reissue continuation of the present application.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This Application application is an application for reissue ofapplication Ser. No. 14/102,378 filed on Dec. 10, 2013 which issued onJan. 17, 2017 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,546,982, which claims the benefit under35 U.S.C. 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/735,505 filedDec. 10, 2012.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to non-destructive testingmethods and apparatuses therefor. More specifically it relates to anon-destructive testing (NDT) method and apparatus for austenitic steelreformer tubes and the like. Most specifically it relates to anelectromagnetic method and apparatus for the early detection ofdeleterious changes in the alloy's microstructure before any otheravailable NDT methods can detect them, thereby estimating the health andremaining service life for in-service austenitic steel reformer tubes.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Austenitic steel reformer tubes are used in many chemical processes.Examples include tubes used to produce ammonia, methanol, hydrogen,nitric and sulfuric acids, and cracking of petroleum. Reformer tubes,also called catalyst tubes, are one of the highest cost components ofsuch plants both in capital and maintenance. A typical installationconsists of several hundred vertical tubes. These tubes represent asignificant cost for replacement and can be a major source of plantunavailability if unplanned failures occur.

Such tubes are typically subjected to high temperatures, temperaturegradients, pressure changes and contact with corrosive substances. Undersuch situations creep, metal dusting, and surface irregularitiesfrequently develop. Creep is a diffusion related process that developsgradually. The signs are not noticeable by reformer operator. Creepforms microscopic voids which coalescence and eventually form creepfissure (cracks). If left untreated, creep will develop into cracks thatwill propagate leading to catastrophic failure of the tube duringservice.

The plant operator is faced with balancing production needs against tubelife and risk of tube failure. During plant operation the catalystfilled tubes are externally heated to allow the reforming reaction tooccur. One of the major concerns in plant operation is that the reformertubes operate at a highly elevated temperature (up to 1150-1200° C.)such that they are susceptible to the failure mechanism referred toabove as “creep”. This condition exists due to the elevated temperaturesand stresses imposed by internal pressure, thermal gradients, andmechanical loading cycles. Being able to identify and locate such damagein its early stages is essential for optimizing plant operation andextending the tube's useful service life.

Known Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) methods based on intermodulationmeasurements are used to find nonlinear conductive materials containedin a non conductive substrate. A different method is needed to deal withnon-linear magnetic materials contained in a conductive substrate.Existing NDT methods for austenitic steel are based on laser shapemeasurement, eddy current testing for surface cracks, and ultrasoundtesting for subsurface cracks. These methods are useful, but tell littleor nothing about changes early in the life of the material. In addition,the existing methods require knowledge of the initial conditions of thematerial and are subject to error due to changes in surface conditions.

Conventional NDT inspection techniques currently applied to reformertubes are geared to finding creep damage in the form of internalcracking. However, with the trend towards larger tube diameters andlonger intervals between turnarounds, the detection of such defects maynot allow for sufficient time for forward planning of tube replacements.Also, such “end of life” techniques do not allow any differentiationbetween the “good” tubes and the “bad” tubes. Early detection ofunderutilized tube life can prevent the lost opportunity on bothunrealized production through running them too cool and tube life“giveaway” if good tubes are discarded prematurely.

Typically, destructive testing is used on a small number of tubesremoved from the reformer to try and determine the absolute liferemaining. Whatever method is used, the results are used on a samplesize that is not statistically valid. It is preferable that all thetubes be surveyed with a NDT technique to characterize their relativecondition.

Reformer tubes undergo creep strain, in the form of longitudinal and/ordiametrical growth, from the first day that they are fired. Measuringthe creep elongation of such tubes is the most popular deteriorationdetection method in routine use today, but this method is veryinaccurate for monitoring in service tube deterioration. This becausethere is no known method for measuring the local longitudinal growth,just total growth which is averaged over the whole length of the tube.

Measuring the diametrical growth is more accurate but could can lead toinaccurate measurements early in the service life of a tube due to thescale effect. That is, accurate measurement of circumferential growth iscomplicated by the growth and sloughing of a corrosion layer (scale) onthe surface of the tube which mimics diametrical expansion. Measuringthe diametrical growth also requires tube climbing equipment.

The ability to accurately measure and record tube deterioration meansthat the tubes' condition can be monitored on day one. Therefore, notonly can individual tubes be retired from service at an appropriatetime, but also the reformer as a whole can be assessed for performance.

To get an idea of the scope of the problem to be solved, one should notethat, at present, ArcelorMittal has 8 reformers that use about 2.500reformer tubes. Tubes are quite expensive, costing more than $30,000each, plus catalyst costs which doubles the tube cost along with cost ofinstallation. Reformers operate continuously from 2 to 5 years betweencold shutdowns.

A method is needed to evaluate the tube current condition duringscheduled cold shutdown and remove the bad tubes to prevent thecatastrophic failure of any tubes during the 2-5 year operation period.Such a failure could result in premature shutdown of the reformer andsignificant loss of time and money.

In addition, a tool is needed to assess performance of the reformer as awhole because reformer operation conditions may not be consistent fromone reformer region to another. If increase in the tubes' deteriorationis faster in certain reformer regions, it indicates that reformeroperation condition is not well balanced. The fine-tuning of thereformer for better balance will improve productivity and save tubesthat otherwise would deteriorate faster in this area. The object is todetect reformer operation abnormality early enough to prevent the tubes'faster deterioration since the changes occurring in the tubemicrostructure due to operation condition are irreversible.

Accordingly, there is a need for an automated method and apparatus forthe examination of reformer tubes. The method should be nondestructiveand able to detect very early changes in tube alloy to allow forreformer adjustment when there is still time to save the tubes.Furthermore the method and apparatus should be able to provide anestimated “reminder of tube life” to assist in tube replacementdecisions.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention comprises a method and apparatus formeasuring/testing the degree of deterioration of an austenitic steelreformer tube. The present method capitalizes on the metallurgicalphenomenon that, as the paramagnetic tube alloy deteriorates, itdevelops ferromagnetic regions that, in early stages, are extremelysmall and undetectable by any other available method. The presentinventors have found good correlation between the alloy magneticproperties, and the lifetime of the heat-resistant Cr—Ni alloy tubes.The present method and apparatus design utilizes the correlation foundbetween the alloy's magnetic properties, structural transformation andthe service lifetime of the heat-resistant Cr—Ni alloy tubes. The methodand apparatus utilizes the correlation to measure thermal damage of thetubes caused by the high-temperature service environment.

The method includes the steps of providing a sample austenitic steelreformer tube to be tested, choosing one or more testing positions onsaid an austenitic steel reformer tube, transmitting two sinusoidalelectromagnetic signals, each having a different frequency F₁ and F₂,into a test position on the austenitic steel reformer tube, receiving aresponse signal from said test position, and analyzing said receivedresponse signal's fundamental and intermodulation frequency magnitudesto determine the state of the austenitic steel reformer tube at saidtest position.

The step of receiving a response signal from the test position mayinclude receiving an analog response signal on a receiver coil. The stepof receiving a response signal from the test position may furtherinclude the step of converting the analog response signal to a digitalresponse signal, using an analog to digital converter. The analog todigital converter may have a sampling frequency F_(s). The step ofconverting the analog response signal to a digital response signal,using an analog to digital converter may include combining a multiple ofsamples into a single representative sample, the number of samples whichare combined into said single representative sample may be designated asthe sample size S_(s). The sample size S_(s) may be an integral power of2. The sample size S_(s) may be a number selected from the groupconsisting of 4096, 8192, and 16384 samples. The sampling frequencyF_(s) may be 44100 samples per second.

The step of transmitting two sinusoidal electromagnetic signals mayinclude the step of defining a base frequency F₀, whereinF₀=F_(s)/S_(s). The step of transmitting two sinusoidal electromagneticsignals may further include the step of choosing the two frequencies F1and F2 such that: F₁=N×F₀; F₂=P×F₀; where N and P are integers with Nnot equal to P, and N and P are chosen such that none of theintermodulation frequencies, F(Q,R)=Q×F₁+R×F₂ are equal to an integralmultiple of F₁ or F₂ for small, non-zero, integer (positive or negative)values of Q and R.

The step of transmitting two sinusoidal electromagnetic signals maycomprise transmitting both signals from a single transmitter coil, ormay comprise transmitting each of the signals from individualtransmitter coils. The transmitter coils may have a larger diameter thanthe thickness of the sample tube to be tested. The step of transmittingtwo sinusoidal electromagnetic signals may comprise creating analogsinusoidal electromagnetic signals using at least one digital-to-analogsignal generator. The two sinusoidal electromagnetic signals may also becreated by two signal generators.

The step of analyzing the received response signal's fundamental andintermodulation frequencies may comprise analyzing the first orderfundamental and third order intermodulation frequencies of said receivedresponse signal. The Fundamental may be F₂. The third orderintermodulation frequencies may be 2F₁+F₂ and F₁+2F₂. The step ofanalyzing the third order intermodulation frequencies may compriseconverting the ratio of the magnitude of the third order intermodulationfrequencies to the magnitude of the fundamental frequency into decibelsdB.

The strength of the third order intermodulation frequencies which havebeen converted into decibels dB may be compared to the same measurementof brand new and end of service life austenitic steel reformer tubes,the comparison may providing a qualitative measure of the health of theaustenitic steel reformer tube. The method may include the further stepof estimating the remaining service life of the austenitic steelreformer tube as a fraction of the present service life of theaustenitic steel reformer tube by the following formulas:fractional life remaining L_(r)=|S_(e)−S_(n)|/S_(e)−S₀|; andestimated lifetime remaining T_(r)=(L_(r)/(1−L_(r)))×T_(n) where:

L_(r) is the estimated percentage of life remaining;

S_(e) is the third order intermodulation frequencies signal strengthconverted into decibels dB of an austenitic steel reformer tube at theend of service life;

S_(n) is the third order intermodulation frequencies signal strengthconverted into decibels dB of the test sample now;

S₀ is either the third order intermodulation frequencies signal strengthwhen there is no tube present under the probe, or the third orderintermodulation frequencies signal strength of a new tube that has beenheated to operating temperature for a few hours, whichever is higher;

T_(r) is the estimated service lifetime remaining for the test sample;and

T_(n) is the present service life of the test sample.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 is a schematic depiction of a probe measurement system of thepresent invention which may be used in the method of the presentinvention;

FIGS. 2a and 2b are two dimensional (2D) plots of the intermodulationfrequency signals (converted to dB) versus distance along the tube for abrand new reformer tube (2a) and a tube that has been in service for 5years (2b);

FIG. 3 is a plot of the intermodulation frequency signal converted todBc along the length of various reformer tubes of the same compositionafter different length of service within the reformer;

FIGS. 4a and 4b are cross sectional optical micrographs of a usedreformer tube sample (type 28% Cr, 48% Ni), which has been in servicefor 5 years in a cooler section of the reformer;

FIGS. 5a and 5b are cross sectional optical micrographs of a usedreformer tube sample (type 28% Cr, 48% Ni) which has also been inservice for five years, but has been exposed to a hotter region of thefurnace; and

FIGS. 6a and 6b are cross sectional optical micrographs of a usedreformer tube sample (type 28% Cr, 48% Ni) which has also been inservice for five years, but has been exposed to the hottest region ofthe furnace.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to measurement/testing methods andapparatus for testing the health of steel tubes used in reformers andother tubes and pipes used in other high temperature applications. Theinventors use an electromagnetic intermodulation technique to measureferromagnetism generated in the paramagnetic alloy during service. Theferromagnetic signal is initially small, but increases with length ofservice and severity of the thermal environment. Conventional eddycurrent NDT methods are not able to detect this very low level ofdeterioration. It is believed that the ferromagnetism, in the initialstage of deterioration, develops in the sub-scale Cr-depleted zones ofthe tube wall, around the carbides and along the grain boundaries, thuscreating the discrete network of ferromagnetic channels throughout theparamagnetic material.

In order to apply signal intermodulation techniques through a conductivemedia (i.e. the steel reformer tubes) it is necessary to use extra lowfrequency signals in order to penetrate quickly throughout thesubstrate. The field configuration must be chosen to ignore surfaceeffects and to provide reasonably uniform sensitivity throughout thesubstrate. Signal processing techniques are used to achieve enoughsensitivity. In addition, because deterioration and failure of thesematerials is a local phenomenon, it is necessary to be able to scan theentire substrate, preferably as quickly as possible.

Generically the method consists of using the probe of the presentinvention to transmit a pair of electromagnetic signals at differentfrequencies into the material to be tested. The probe then records theresponse of the material to the pair of signals, and this response isused to determine the physical state of the material.

To more fully understand the present inventions, the probe and thetesting criterion/technique will be described. Thereafter, the specificsof use of the probe and technique to determine the health and projecteduseful life expectancy of steel tubes that have been subjected to hightemperature environments will be described.

The Probe

FIG. 1 is a schematic depiction of a probe measurement system of thepresent invention. The material to be tested 1 is also shown in FIG. 1.Two sinusoidal current generators 2, shown here as D/A 1 and D/A 2, areused to drive a complex varying magnetic field into the sample 1 throughtwo transmitter coils 3. While this example embodiment depicts twotransmitter circuits in order to simplify circuit design, a probe couldbe designed using only one. The transmitter coils 3 preferably have alarger diameter than the thickness of the sample 1 so that the magneticfields under the center of the transmitter coils 3 are essentiallyuniform. The transmitter coils 3 are arranged coaxially. A receiver coil4 is positioned in this region of essentially uniform magnetic fieldswithin the two transmitter coils 3. Voltages induced in the receivercoil 4 are detected and used to determine information related to samples1 being tested. Preferably an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter 5 isused to convert the induced voltage in the receiver coil 4 into digitalsamples which are sent to the microprocessor 7. All of the electronicsof the probe use a common clock 6.

While the above description of the probe includes two transmitter coils3 and two sinusoidal current generators 2, this is not the onlyconfiguration that will work to achieve the desired measurements. Forinstance, a single transmitter coil 3 and single generator 2 can be usedto produce the two signals. This the least expensive probe to build. Thegenerator 2 is much more expensive since it must have a very low IMD(inter modulation distortion) value. In another configuration, the probecan have a single coil 3 and two generators 2. This embodiment isprobably more expensive to build than the single coil/generatorembodiment since there are two generators 2, and the final amplifier(s)must able to combine the signals.

In yet another embodiment, the probe may have two coils 3 and a singlegenerator 2. This embodiment is more expensive than the singlecoil/generator, but the two coils 3 add flexibility. If the two coils 3are used in “push-pull” mode, the final amplifier would be easier tobuild. The embodiment described above which includes two coils 3 and twogenerators 2, is the only high sensitivity configuration that could bebuilt without low IMD components. In a variant on this embodiment, thecoils carry apposing DC current components that can cancel or enhancestray magnetic fields.

Finally, there is an embodiment that includes four coils 3 and twogenerators 2. The coil would be very difficult to build, but the twogenerators and amplifiers are simpler, since they can both operate inpush pull mode. If a second probe is used, the coils in the two probesare connected in series, with the sense of the second signal reversed inthe second probe. This cancels out the mutual inductance effect,improving the transmitted signals considerably. This provides thehighest possible sensitivity with available technology.

General Use of the Probe

Regardless of the specific configuration of the probe, two sinusoidalsignals are created and transmitted into a sample to be tested. Thereason for using two signals is now discussed. Voltages are induced inthe receiver coil by the transmitted signal(s), and any small changesinduced by the sample being tested will be indistinguishable, comparedto the power of the transmitted signal. Thus, the power at some otherfrequency, not present in the transmitted signal, needs to be measured.The test sample will also likely create harmonics of the transmittedsignal (i.e. where x is the frequency of transmitted signal, theharmonics would be 2x, 3x, 4x, etc) which will be picked up by thereceiver coil. Thus, reading the harmonic signal created by the samplemay provide useful information on the sample being tested.Unfortunately, the signal generators will also likely produce harmonicsof the transmitted signal, and, again, the signal produced by the samplewill likely be small (i.e. noise) compared to the transmitted harmonics.Finally, when two signals are transmitted into the sample, any nonlinearelectrical or magnetic properties in the sample being tested willproduce intermodulation products of the two transmitted signals, whichare also picked up by the receiver coil. Intermodulation productfrequencies are additive and subtractive combinations of two or morefrequencies. For instance for two frequencies, F₁ and F₂, someintermodulation product frequencies are F₁+F₂; F₁−F₂; 2F₁+F₂; 2F₁−F₂;2F₁+2F₂; etc.

For real world use, the transmitter frequencies, F₁ and F₂, the A/Dconverter sampling frequency F_(s), and the sample size S_(s) are chosento meet the following requirements. The sample size S_(s) is a is anintegral power of two (such as, for example, 4096, or 8192, or 16384).F_(s) is the sampling frequency of the A/D converter in samples/second.Base frequency will be defined as F₀=F_(s)/S_(s). F₁=N×F₀; F₂=P×F₀;where N and P are integers with N not equal to P. Also, N and P arechosen such that none of the intermodulation frequenciesF(Q,R)=Q×F₁+R×F₂ are equal to an integral multiple of F₁ or F₂ forsmall, non-zero, integer (positive or negative) values of Q and R.

Any nonlinear electrical or magnetic properties in the sample willproduce intermodulation products at frequencies F(Q,R). The transmitterapparatus does not produce these frequencies F(Q,R), so the amplitudesof the F(Q,R) components are an absolute measurement of the propertiesof the nonlinear material. Given that:F(Q,R)=(Q×N+R×P)×F₀=M×F₀where M is an integer, the amplitudes of the F(Q,R) components areeasily obtained using a Fast Fourier Transform or a Finite ImpulseResponse filter on the set of sample measurements taken by the NDconverter.

EXAMPLE OF SPECIFIC USE OF THE PROBE AND TESTING METHOD

The present inventors have found the probe and testing method of thepresent invention is very useful in determining the state ofdeterioration of austenitic alloy reformer tubes used in hydrogenreformers. It was noted that deterioration of these austenitic alloys isassociated with the appearance of ferromagnetic properties and fromthis, the inventors determined that it might be possible to predictremaining service life if the amount of deterioration could be measured.

Measurement

The probe and method described is used to measure the health of creepresistant austenitic alloys of the type used in the reformer tubes ofhydrogen reformers. It is believed that the probe measures the totalmagnetic moment and density of certain ferromagnetic micro-zones whichcan be correlated with the development and deterioration of creepresistance in these alloys. As disclosed above, the method applies twosinusoidal magnetizing fields at slightly different frequencies to thealloy. The magnetic flux resulting from these magnetizing fields as wellas the magnetic flux due to induced magnetic moments within the alloy issampled, processed, and analyzed. Measurements are taken at spacedintervals along the length and circumference of the tubes. This allowsfor 2d and 3d mapping of the health of the tube.

Analysis

From the total magnetic flux that is received by the receiver coil ateach individual testing location, the fundamental and intermodulationfrequency signals thereof are isolated. These intermodulation frequencysignals provide useful information to analyze the health of theaustenitic alloy in the tubes at the specific testing positions. Ofparticular interest is the third order intermodulation frequencies. Thepower levels at the intermodulation frequencies are converted intodecibels (dB) relative to the fundamental frequency power and plotted in2D or 3D graphs against the position along the length and/orcircumference of the tube. In the same manner as percentages, decibels,in this case 20×LOG(V_(measured)/V_(reference)), must always be theratio of two numbers. Comparison with the fundamental magnitude is mostuseful because this ratio is independent of receiver characteristics,and not overly sensitive to transmitter characteristics.

FIGS. 2a and 2b are two dimensional (2D) plots of the intermodulationfrequency signals (converted to dB) versus distance along the tube for abrand new reformer tube (with no residual delta ferrite inclusions) anda tube that has been in service for 5 years, respectively). As can beseen from FIG. 2a, the residual free “new” reformer tube has a thirdorder intermodulation frequency response below the noise floor for theexisting probes, therefor all that we can see is the uncorrelatedelectrical noise from the probe itself. Because all that is beingrecorded is the electrical noise of the probe system, the signalstrength (converted to dB) jumps rapidly to any value between −95 dB to−115 dB. Overall, it can be seen that a new tube has a very lowintermodulation response signal of, on average, less than 100 dB andthis will be taken as the hallmark of an undamaged tube.

In contrast to FIG. 2a, FIG. 2b shows the intermodulation responsesignal of a tube which, while formed from the very same materials as thetube of FIG. 2a, has been in use in a hydrogen reformer for 5 years. Ascan be seen, use in the extreme environment of the hydrogen reformerfurnace has changed the intermodulation frequency signal response. Thesignal has increased significantly versus the virgin tube. It should benoted that the very top of the tube is embedded in the furnace ceilingand is attached to a flange. This provides a continuous cooling effectthereby preventing the topmost end from deteriorating as quickly as thetube portions that are exposed to the full thermal effects of thefurnace. As can be seen, the response signal of the upper portion of thetube that is exposed to the furnace environment has increasedsubstantially, peaking at about −40 db. This indicates that the tube hassignificantly deteriorated in that area and may point to a hot spot inthe reformer (possibly a hydrogen leak in a neighboring tube). The lowerhalf of the tube is formed of a different alloy than the top half. Thereformer tube is actually formed of two tubes which are welded together.The upper tube is formed of a 28Cr/48Ni/Fe type of heat resistant castalloy while the lower tube is formed of a 25Cr/35Ni/Fe type of heatresistant cast alloy. The lower half has a different reaction to thethermal environment than the top half. The lower half of the tube isrelatively uniformly deteriorated and its response signal would indicatethat this portion of the tube has at least a reasonable length of liferemaining. Finally, similar to the top of the tube, the bottom of thetube is embedded in the floor of the furnace and as such issignificantly protected from the thermal effects of the furnace.

Thus the analysis of the intermodulation response signal indicates thatthe lower half of the 5 year old tube is aging evenly, while the tophalf is being subjected to a varying furnace environment that mayinclude a “hot spot”, which is prematurely aging the uppermost portionof the tube. This premature aging may cause the tube to fail in thatarea (i.e. cause a hydrogen leak or even break off and fall) which coulddamage other tubes in its vicinity. Thus, knowledge of the condition ofthe tube along its entire length allows operators to replace individualtubes as necessary, and also, importantly, allows operators to continueusing older tube which have not deteriorated to the point of needingreplacement.

To determine the expected remaining service life of a tube, themeasurements of the intermodulation response signal from multiple tubesof different ages were taken (i.e. new tubes, tubes that have been inservice in the reformer for varying amounts of time and failed tubes).FIG. 3 is a plot of the intermodulation frequency signal converted todBc along the length of various reformer tubes of the same compositionafter different length of service within the reformer. As can be seen,the longer a tube has been in service the stronger the intermodulationfrequency signal strength of the tube. Once this data is collected, theremaining service life as a fraction of current age can be determined bycomparison with the measurements taken on similar tubes at intervalsthrough their service life.

The remaining service life of the reformer tube as a fraction of thepresent service life and the actual remaining service life can beestimated by the following formulas:% life remaining L_(r)=|S_(e)−S_(n)|/|S_(e)−S₀|; andestimated lifetime remaining T_(r)=(L_(r)/(1−L_(r)))×T_(n)Where L_(r) is the estimated fraction of life remaining; S_(e) is thethird order intermodulation frequencies signal strength converted intodecibels dB of an austenitic steel reformer tube at the end of servicelife; S_(n) is the third order intermodulation frequencies signalstrength converted into decibels dB of the test sample now; S₀ is eitherthe third order intermodulation frequencies signal strength when thereis no tube present under the probe, or the third order intermodulationfrequencies signal strength of a new tube that has been heated tooperating temperature for a few hours, whichever is higher; T_(r) is theestimated service lifetime remaining for the test sample; and T_(n) isthe present service life of the test sample.

The best value for S₀ is the open air calibration point for the probeused to test the tubes, that is, the third order signal strength whenthere is no tube present. This value generally ranges from −90 to −109dB_(c) for the probe and amplifier combinations tested so far. There isreason to believe that the real value for S₀ is −120 to −130 dB_(c), butit is not possible to make meaningful measurements below the open aircalibration point of the testing device. The next best value would betaken from a tube that has been brought up to operating temperature fora few hours. This is because new, as cast, tubes can contain an unstableform of delta ferrite sometimes left over from the casting process. Thisresidual disappears upon heating. The impact of this residual on overalltube life is unknown, but it can't be used for the equations presentedabove. There have been cases where there is no initial IMD for the ascast tube, but this is the exception, not the rule.

As an example let us suppose that the present third orderintermodulation frequencies signal strength converted into decibels dBof the tube to be tested is −50 dB, that of a new tube of the same type(alloy composition, processing, etc) as that to be tested is −100 dB,and that of a tube at the end of its service life is −40 db. Thefractional remaining service life L_(r) would be|−40−(−50)|/|−40−(−100)|= 10/60=⅙. Let us further assume that thepresent service life of the test sample T_(n) is 85 months. Then theestimated service lifetime remaining for the test sampleT_(r)=(⅙/(1−⅙))×85 months=17 months.

It should be noted that the present inventors have learned that thepresent testing method and equations do not work for tubes with profounddamage. In tubes this damaged, the IMD value begins to drop, while themagnitude of the FF or tubes with profound damage, the IMD value beginsto drop, while the magnitude of the F2 component at the receiverincreases. The effect becomes noticeable at an IMD value of −40 dB_(c),and by the time F2 reaches half of its maximum value the IMD valuereaches −35 dBc. Beyond that point IMD begins to fall as F2 continues toa maximum. In such a case a synthetic IMD value can be projected fromthis that extends above −35 dB_(c) and by the time the synthetic IMDvalue reaches 0 the tube is cracked all the way through.

Deployment/Use of the Probe Via a Crawler

One or more probes may be attached to a transportation device which willallow the probes to traverse the length and width or circumference ofthe sample to be tested. The transportation device may take the form ofa crawler that has the ability to traverse horizontal samples or toclimb up and down a vertical sample. Also, depending on the number ofprobes on the crawler, the crawler may have the ability to turncircumferentially around the sample to reposition the probe to differentpoints on the circumference of the sample. Preferably the crawlerincludes means for measuring the position of the probe with respect tothe dimensions of the sample so that the measured intermodulationfrequency signals can be correlated with specific locations on thesample.

The crawler may also carry the supporting electronics for the probe,such as signal generators, A/D and D/A converters, etc. The receivedintermodulation frequency signals may be recorded onboard the crawler,such as in a dedicated storage medium, for later retrieval.Alternatively, the signals may be transmitted to a separate storagedevice (wired or wireless transfer). The intermodulation frequencysignal processing electronics may be onboard, but preferably are not.

Metallurgical Examination

While not wishing to be bound by theory, the inventors present thefollowing metallurgical explanation behind the measurements/resultsproduced when applying the method and probe of the present invention.

The present method and probe use induced magnetization to detectdeterioration in iron nickel chromium carbon alloy tubes. The initialmaterial is not ferromagnetic but loss of chromium and an increase incarbides will change the microstructure and produce ferromagneticregions with high permeability. It is known that iron nickel chromiumalloys get their creep resistance from carbides that precipitate in theas cast matrix, and that additional carbides precipitate and enlargewith time and temperature. It has been discovered that as chromium andiron migrate into these carbides a zone will form near or surroundingthe carbides that is enhanced in nickel and depleted in chromium. Theresulting ferromagnetic structures are easily driven into saturation byweak magnetizing fields. As creep sets in, chromium is also lost tocracks that form within the alloy, leaving nickel and iron to form thinferromagnetic sheets within the matrix near the cracks. Once again,these structures are easily driven into saturation by the weakmagnetizing field of the probe of the instant invention. These inducedmagnetic moments contain harmonics and intermodulation products of theoriginal two sinusoidal magnetizing fields that can be related to thesize and density of the structures.

FIGS. 4a and 4b are cross sectional optical micrographs of a usedreformer tube alloy sample (type 28% Cr, 48% Ni), which has been inservice for 5 years in a cooler section of the reformer. The sample hasbeen taken from the subsurface area of the tube at the inner diameter(ID). The ID surface is at bottom right corner of the photomicrographs.The sample has been metallographically polished, but not etched. In FIG.4a, the polished surface of the sample is coated with a thin layer offerrofluid before but no magnetic field has been applied. A ferrofluidis a liquid which becomes strongly magnetized in the presence of amagnetic field. Ferrofluids are colloidal liquids made of nanoscaleferromagnetic, or ferrimagnetic, particles suspended in a carrier fluid(usually an organic solvent or water). Each tiny particle is thoroughlycoated with a surfactant to inhibit clumping.

FIG. 4b shows the same sample (as 4a) after a magnetic field has beenapplied. It can he seen that the ferrofluid migrates to the magneticareas around the carbides, and to the grain boundaries. Comparing theareas within the ovals between FIGS. 4a and 4b (i.e. before and afterapplying the magnetic field) it can be seen that there are grainboundaries within the circle that are clearly visible once they attractthe ferrofluid.

It should be noted that the magnetic regions are confined to narrowregions (below the surface scale) around the carbides, and to the grainboundaries for this sample. However, in a hotter area of the furnace, oras the length of time the tube has been in service increases, theregions (below the surface scale) around the carbides, and the grainboundaries grow. FIGS. 5a and 5b are cross sectional optical micrographsof a used reformer tube sample (type 28% Cr, 48% Ni) which has also beenin service for five years, but has been exposed to a hotter region ofthe furnace. Again, the sample was metallographically polished, but notetched. In FIG. 5a, the polished surface of the sample is coated with athin layer of ferrofluid as before but no magnetic field has beenapplied. FIG. 5b shows the same sample (as 5a) after a magnetic fieldhas been applied. It can be seen again that the ferrofluid migrates tothe magnetic areas. However, this time it can be seen that the magneticregions have grown thicker (see the white arrows) and more abundant thanthose in FIGS. 4a & 4b. This is believed to be because the alloydeteriorates more quickly in the hotter regions, which in turn isbelieved to be caused by migration of the Cr to the carbide, carbidetransformation into Cr-oxides, and ultimately volatilization of somespecies of Cr-oxides, leaving an ever expanding region which is depletedof Cr. This is why the intermodulation signals increase over the servicelifetime of the steel.

Finally, FIGS. 6a and 6b are cross sectional optical micrographs of aused reformer tube sample (type 28% Cr, 48% Ni) which has also been inservice for five years, but has been exposed to the hottest region ofthe furnace. Again, the sample was metallographically polished, but notetched. In FIG. 6a, the polished surface of the sample is coated with athin layer of ferrofluid as before but no magnetic field has beenapplied. FIG. 6b shows the same sample (as 6a) after a magnetic fieldhas been applied. It can now be seen that the ferrofluid migrates outfrom the carbides and other inclusions and forms a characteristiclabyrinthine pattern over the alloy matrix surface. Grain boundaries andsub surface magnetic materials are no longer visible indicating that theentire matrix has become magnetic. At this point intermodulation signalsbegin to disappear since the magnetizing field is not strong enough tosaturate the matrix. At the same time, the magnetic matrix acts like thecore of a transformer coupling the transmitter and receiver coilstogether, thus allowing this region to be detected as an increase in themagnitude of the F2 signal at the receiver.

The foregoing is provided for purposes of explaining and disclosingpreferred embodiments of the present invention. Modifications andadaptations to the described embodiments will be apparent to thoseskilled in the art. These changes and others may be made withoutdeparting from the scope or spirit of the invention in the followingclaims.

We claim:
 1. A method of testing an austenitic steel reformer tubecomprising: providing a sample austenitic steel reformer tube to betested; choosing one or more testing positions on said an austeniticsteel reformer tube; transmitting two sinusoidal electromagneticsignals, each having a different frequency F₁ and F₂, into a testposition on the austenitic steel reformer tube; receiving a responsesignal from said test position; and analyzing said received responsesignal's fundamental and intermodulation frequencies to determine thestate of the austenitic steel reformer tube at said test position;wherein said step of receiving a response signal from said test positionincludes receiving an analog response signal on a receiver coil; whereinsaid step of receiving a response signal from said test position furtherincludes the step of converting said analog response signal to a digitalresponse signal, using an analog to digital converter; wherein saidanalog to digital converter has a sampling frequency F_(s); and whereinsaid step of converting said analog response signal to a digitalresponse signal, using an analog to digital converter includes combininga multiple of samples into a single representative sample, the number ofsamples which are combined into said single representative sample beingdesignated the sample size S_(s).
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein saidstep of receiving a response signal from said test position includesreceiving an analog response signal on a receiver coil.
 3. The method ofclaim 2, wherein said step of receiving a response signal from said testposition further includes the step of converting said analog responsesignal to a digital response signal, using an analog to digitalconverter.
 4. The method of claim 3, wherein said analog to digitalconverter has a sampling frequency F_(s).
 5. The method of claim 4,wherein said step of converting said analog response signal to a digitalresponse signal, using an analog to digital converter includes combininga multiple of samples into a single representative sample, the number ofsamples which are combined into said single representative sample beingdesignated the sample size S_(s).
 6. The method of claim 5 1, whereinsaid sample size S_(s) is a is an integral power of
 2. 7. The method ofclaim 6, wherein said sample size S_(s) is a number selected from thegroup consisting of 4096, 8192, and 16384 samples.
 8. The method ofclaim 7, wherein said sampling frequency F_(s) is 44100 samples persecond.
 9. The method of claim 5, wherein said step of transmitting twosinusoidal electromagnetic signals includes the step of defining a basefrequency F₀, wherein F₀=F_(s)/S_(s).
 10. The method of claim 9, whereinsaid step of transmitting two sinusoidal electromagnetic signals furtherincludes the step of choosing said two frequencies F1 and F2 such that:F₁=N×F₀;F₂=P×F₀; where N and P are integers with N not equal to P, and N and Pare chosen such that none of the intermodulation frequencies,F(Q,R)=Q×F₁+R×F₂ are equal to an integral multiple of F₁ or F₂ forsmall, non-zero, integer (positive or negative) values of Q and R. 11.The method of claim 1, wherein said step of transmitting two sinusoidalelectromagnetic signals comprises transmitting both of said signals froma single transmitter coil.
 12. The method of claim 1, wherein said stepof transmitting two sinusoidal electromagnetic signals comprisestransmitting each of said signals from individual transmitter coils. 13.The method of claim 12, A method of testing an austenitic steel reformertube comprising: providing a sample austenitic steel reformer tube to betested; choosing one or more testing positions on said an austeniticsteel reformer tube; transmitting two sinusoidal electromagneticsignals, each having a different frequency F₁ and F₂, into a testposition on the austenitic steel reformer tube; receiving a responsesignal from said test position; and analyzing said received responsesignal's fundamental and intermodulation frequencies to determine thestate of the austenitic steel reformer tube at said test position;wherein said step of transmitting two sinusoidal electromagnetic signalscomprises transmitting each of said signals from individual transmittercoils; and wherein said transmitter coils have a larger diameter thanthe thickness of the sample tube to be tested.
 14. The method of claim1, wherein said step of transmitting two sinusoidal electromagneticsignals comprises creating analog sinusoidal electromagnetic signalsusing at least one digital-to-analog signal generator.
 15. The method ofclaim 14, wherein said two sinusoidal electromagnetic signals arecreated by two signal generators.
 16. The method of claim 1, whereinsaid step of analyzing said received response signal's fundamental andintermodulation frequencies comprises analyzing the first orderfundamental and the third order intermodulation frequencies of saidreceived response signal.
 17. The method of claim 16, wherein saidfundamental is F₂ and said third order intermodulation frequencies are2F₁+F₂ and F₁+2F₂.
 18. The method of claim 16, wherein said step ofanalyzing the third order intermodulation frequencies comprisesconverting the amplitude of said third order intermodulation frequenciesinto decibels dB relative to the amplitude of said fundamental.
 19. Themethod of claim 18, wherein the strength of said third orderintermodulation frequencies which have been converted into decibels dBis compared to the same measurement of brand new and end of service lifeaustenitic steel reformer tubes, said comparison providing a qualitativemeasure of the health of said austenitic steel reformer tube.
 20. Themethod of claim 19, A method of testing an austenitic steel reformertube comprising: providing a sample austenitic steel reformer tube to betested; choosing one or more testing positions on said an austeniticsteel reformer tube; transmitting two sinusoidal electromagneticsignals, each having a different frequency F₁ and F₂, into a testposition on the austenitic steel reformer tube; receiving a responsesignal from said test position; and analyzing said received responsesignal's fundamental and intermodulation frequencies to determine thestate of the austenitic steel reformer tube at said test position;wherein said step of analyzing said received response signal'sfundamental and intermodulation frequencies comprises analyzing thefirst order fundamental and the third order intermodulation frequenciesof said received response signal; wherein said step of analyzing thethird order intermodulation frequencies comprises converting theamplitude of said third order intermodulation frequencies into decibelsdB relative to the amplitude of said fundamental; wherein the strengthof said third order intermodulation frequencies which have beenconverted into decibels dB is compared to the same measurement of brandnew and end of service life austenitic steel reformer tubes, saidcomparison providing a qualitative measure of the health of saidaustenitic steel reformer tube; and including the further step ofestimating the remaining service life of said austenitic steel reformertube as a fraction of the present service life of said austenitic steelreformer tube by the following formulas:fractional life remaining L_(r)=|S_(e)−S_(n)|/|S_(e)−S₀|; andestimated lifetime remaining T_(r)=(L_(r)/(1−L_(r)))×T_(n) where: L_(r)is the estimated percentage of life remaining; S_(e) is the third orderintermodulation frequencies signal strength converted into decibels dBof an austenitic steel reformer tube at the end of service life; S_(n)is the third order intermodulation frequencies signal strength convertedinto decibels dB of the test sample now; S₀ is either the third orderintermodulation frequencies signal strength when there is no tubepresent under the probe, or the third order intermodulation frequenciessignal strength of a new tube that has been heated to operatingtemperature for a few hours, whichever is higher; T_(r) is the estimatedservice lifetime remaining for the test sample; and T_(n) is the presentservice life of the test sample.